Home › Entities › academia › Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest

Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest

Research article (ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2020) · cited 137× · AI/ML
academia openalex:W3089962227
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest

Summary

Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest is a scholarly article[1].

Key Facts

  • Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/is-field-measured-tree-height-as-reliable-as-believed-part-ii-a-comparison-study-of-tree-height-estimates-from-conventio
MLA “Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/is-field-measured-tree-height-as-reliable-as-believed-part-ii-a-comparison-study-of-tree-height-estimates-from-conventio.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_is-field-measured-tree-height-as-reliable-as-believed-part-ii-a-comparison-study-of-tree-height-estimates-from-conventio_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/is-field-measured-tree-height-as-reliable-as-believed-part-ii-a-comparison-study-of-tree-height-estimates-from-conventio}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Is field-measured tree height as reliable as believed – Part II, A comparison study of tree height estimates from conventional field measurement and low-cost close-range remote sensing in a deciduous forest — https://4ort.xyz/entity/is-field-measured-tree-height-as-reliable-as-believed-part-ii-a-comparison-study-of-tree-height-estimates-from-conventio (retrieved 2026-05-24)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/is-field-measured-tree-height-as-reliable-as-believed-part-ii-a-comparison-study-of-tree-height-estimates-from-conventio · Last refreshed: