forgery of documents

Summary

forgery of documents ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (1 views/month).^[1]

Key Facts

• forgery of documents's main regulatory text is recorded as Strafgesetzbuch^[2].
• forgery of documents's GND ID is recorded as 4126021-1^[3].
• forgery of documents's subclass of is recorded as forgery^[4].
• forgery of documents's subclass of is recorded as production process^[5].
• forgery of documents's subclass of is recorded as fraud^[6].
• forgery of documents's subclass of is recorded as crime^[7].
• forgery of documents's Freebase ID is recorded as /m/06wnx2^[8].
• forgery of documents's topic's main category is recorded as Category:Document forgery^[9].
• forgery of documents's product or material produced is recorded as forged document^[10].
• forgery of documents's depicted by is recorded as A 20th-Century Master Scam^[11].
• forgery of documents's described by source is recorded as Meyers Konversations-Lexikon, 4th edition (1885–1890)^[12].
• forgery of documents's partially coincident with is recorded as Urkundenfälschung^[13].
• forgery of documents's Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID is recorded as topic/forgery-law^[14].
• forgery of documents's Google Knowledge Graph ID is recorded as /g/11cmfhktk2^[15].
• forgery of documents's Cultureel Woordenboek ID is recorded as wet-en-recht/valsheid-in-geschrifte^[16].
• forgery of documents's JSTOR topic ID is recorded as misrepresentation^[17].
• forgery of documents's EuroVoc ID is recorded as 8433^[18].
• forgery of documents's ANZSOC 2011 ID is recorded as 0922^[19].
• forgery of documents's museum-digital tag ID is recorded as 69020^[20].
• forgery of documents's Yale LUX ID is recorded as concept/4b3dc322-528e-48a1-b5b0-0ab07375ee5c^[21].

Why It Matters

forgery of documents ranks in the top 2% of general entities by monthly Wikipedia readership (1 views/month).^[1] It has Wikipedia articles in 7 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.^[22] It is known by 15 alternative names across languages and contexts.^[23]