Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)
0 sources
Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)
Summary
Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella) is a bachelor's with honors thesis[1].
Key Facts
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella) authored Phillip W. Taylor[2].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s instance of is recorded as bachelor's with honors thesis[3].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s publisher is recorded as Research@Lincoln[4].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s language of work or name is recorded as English[5].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s country of origin is recorded as New Zealand[6].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s publication date is recorded as +1990-00-00T00:00:00Z[7].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s main subject is recorded as plant protection[8].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s main subject is recorded as Epiphyas postvittana[9].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s main subject is recorded as Plutella xylostella[10].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s main subject is recorded as Bacillus thuringiensis[11].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s Handle ID is recorded as 10182/11787[12].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s title is recorded as Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)[13].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s copyright holder is recorded as Phillip W. Taylor[14].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s thesis submitted to is recorded as Lincoln University[15].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s on focus list of Wikimedia project is recorded as NZThesisProject[16].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s copyright status is recorded as copyrighted[17].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s online access status is recorded as closed user group[18].
- Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s thesis committee member is recorded as R. Bruce Chapman[19].
Body
Designation and Status
Effects of a feeding stimulant on the efficacy of a (Bacillus thuringiensis) insecticide against the lightbrown apple moth, (Epiphyas postvittana), and the Diamondback moth, (Plutella xylostella)'s instance of is recorded as bachelor's with honors thesis[3].