Crown Court
Facts
9 properties- Inception
- 1972[4]
- Country
- United Kingdom[1]
- Official website
- www.judiciary.uk[5]
- Website
- www.judiciary.uk
- Subclass of
- superior court, Courts of England and Wales[2][3]
- Applies to jurisdiction
- England and Wales[6]
- Different from
- Crown Court[10]
- Name in kana
- けいじほういん[9]
- Replaces
- Assizes, Quarter Sessions[7][8]
- Encyclopædia Britannica Online ID
- topic/Crown-Court
- Freebase ID
- /m/02rcc2
- Lex ID
- Crown_Court
- UK Parliament thesaurus ID
- 90790
Applies to jurisdiction 1
Country 1
Different from 1
Replaces 1
Subclass of 1
← Different from 1
← FactGrid item ID 1
← Replaced by 1
0 sources
high ≥ 0.90 · emerging ≥ 0.65 · low below — calibrated against hand-rated truth (single-source .44 · two-source .62 · production-typical .70), so a band is a measurement, not a promise. High is rare by design: it needs both a supported assertion and an evidence sentence. A confirmed or contradicted chip is a Wikidata cross-check; no chip means Wikidata has no value for that property — the ordinary case here, and it says nothing either way. A confirm-only note marks a property whose check can never disagree (Wikidata's border and capital data is not exhaustive), so silence there is a limit of the check, not of the claim.
served-tier precision 80.7% [76.2, 84.5] · rated rows currently served n=342 · entailment-gated at 0.85 · measured 2026-09-29 · re-scored every 10 min, demoted at the half-hourly fold
evidence “Before Brand's sentencing, Judge Joel Bennathan of London's Crown Court in Southwark said the sexual assaults and rape Brand committed against the four women between 2004 and 2009 were fueled by his "staggering arrogance."” wondradio.com · read source
Show 1 low-confidence claim
Published, not hidden — scoring low is not a reason to withhold a sourced claim. A contradicted chip means Wikidata holds a different value; both are shown so you can judge.
evidence “Her comments come after Prime Minister Andy Burnham announced plans to create dedicated rape and serious sexual offence courtrooms in every Crown Court in England and Wales within two years, alongside measures aimed at improving victims’ experiences and cutting delays.” eadt.co.uk · read source