cone dystrophy
inherited ocular disorder characterized by the loss of cone cells
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
cone dystrophy
Summary
cone dystrophy is a rare disease[1]. It draws 42 Wikipedia views per month (rare_disease category, ranking #208 of 627).[2]
Key Facts
- cone dystrophy's image is recorded as Fundus of a patient with cone rod dystrophy.png[3].
- cone dystrophy's instance of is recorded as rare disease[4].
- cone dystrophy's instance of is recorded as class of disease[5].
- cone dystrophy's subclass of is recorded as retinal disease[6].
- cone dystrophy's Commons category is recorded as Cone dystrophy[7].
- cone dystrophy's MeSH descriptor ID is recorded as D000077765[8].
- cone dystrophy's OMIM ID is recorded as 610024[9].
- cone dystrophy's OMIM ID is recorded as 610356[10].
- cone dystrophy's OMIM ID is recorded as 610478[11].
- cone dystrophy's OMIM ID is recorded as 613093[12].
- cone dystrophy's OMIM ID is recorded as 180020[13].
- cone dystrophy's ICD-10 ID is recorded as H35.5[14].
- cone dystrophy's MeSH tree code is recorded as C11.270.151[15].
- cone dystrophy's MeSH tree code is recorded as C11.768.216[16].
- cone dystrophy's Disease Ontology ID is recorded as DOID:0050795[17].
- cone dystrophy's health specialty is recorded as ophthalmology[18].
- cone dystrophy's genetic association is recorded as PDE6H[19].
- cone dystrophy's genetic association is recorded as PDE6C[20].
- cone dystrophy's genetic association is recorded as KCNV2[21].
- cone dystrophy's genetic association is recorded as CACNA2D4[22].
- cone dystrophy's BabelNet ID is recorded as 01749600n[23].
- cone dystrophy's exact match is recorded as http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/DOID_0050795[24].
- cone dystrophy's exact match is recorded as http://identifiers.org/doid/DOID:0050795[25].
- cone dystrophy's exact match is recorded as http://www.orpha.net/ORDO/Orphanet_1871[26].
- cone dystrophy's UMLS CUI is recorded as C1867326[27].
Why It Matters
cone dystrophy draws 42 Wikipedia views per month (rare_disease category, ranking #208 of 627).[2] It has Wikipedia articles in 7 language editions, a strong signal of global cultural recognition.[28] It is known by 7 alternative names across languages and contexts.[29]