Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds
Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds
Research article (Journal of Mountain Science, 2021) · cited 25× · AI/ML
Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds
Summary
Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-different-sampling-strategies-for-debris-flow-susceptibility-mapping-a-case-study-using-the-centroids-of-t
MLA“Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-different-sampling-strategies-for-debris-flow-susceptibility-mapping-a-case-study-using-the-centroids-of-t.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_comparison-of-different-sampling-strategies-for-debris-flow-susceptibility-mapping-a-case-study-using-the-centroids-of-t_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-different-sampling-strategies-for-debris-flow-susceptibility-mapping-a-case-study-using-the-centroids-of-t}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Comparison of different sampling strategies for debris flow susceptibility mapping: A case study using the centroids of the scarp area, flowing area and accumulation area of debris flow watersheds — https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparison-of-different-sampling-strategies-for-debris-flow-susceptibility-mapping-a-case-study-using-the-centroids-of-t (retrieved 2026-05-24)
