Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts -- Reduct, Modularization, and Strong Equivalence in Abstract Argumentation
Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts -- Reduct, Modularization, and Strong Equivalence in Abstract Argumentation
Research article (Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2020) · cited 20× · AI/ML
Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts -- Reduct, Modularization, and Strong Equivalence in Abstract Argumentation
Summary
Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts -- Reduct, Modularization, and Strong Equivalence in Abstract Argumentation is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts -- Reduct, Modularization, and Strong Equivalence in Abstract Argumentation's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts -- Reduct, Modularization, and Strong Equivalence in Abstract Argumentation. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparing-weak-admissibility-semantics-to-their-dung-style-counterparts-reduct-modularization-and-strong-equivalence-in-
MLA“Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts -- Reduct, Modularization, and Strong Equivalence in Abstract Argumentation.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparing-weak-admissibility-semantics-to-their-dung-style-counterparts-reduct-modularization-and-strong-equivalence-in-.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_comparing-weak-admissibility-semantics-to-their-dung-style-counterparts-reduct-modularization-and-strong-equivalence-in-_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts -- Reduct, Modularization, and Strong Equivalence in Abstract Argumentation}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparing-weak-admissibility-semantics-to-their-dung-style-counterparts-reduct-modularization-and-strong-equivalence-in-}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Comparing Weak Admissibility Semantics to their Dung-style Counterparts -- Reduct, Modularization, and Strong Equivalence in Abstract Argumentation — https://4ort.xyz/entity/comparing-weak-admissibility-semantics-to-their-dung-style-counterparts-reduct-modularization-and-strong-equivalence-in- (retrieved 2026-05-24)
