Home › Entities › academia › Assessment of the effects of characterization methods selection on the landslide susceptibility: a comparison between logistic regression (LR), naive bayes (NB) and radial basis function network (RBF Network)

Assessment of the effects of characterization methods selection on the landslide susceptibility: a comparison between logistic regression (LR), naive bayes (NB) and radial basis function network (RBF Network)

Research article (Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2025) · cited 13× · AI/ML
academia openalex:W4407602317
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

Assessment of the effects of characterization methods selection on the landslide susceptibility: a comparison between logistic regression (LR), naive bayes (NB) and radial basis function network (RBF Network)

Summary

Assessment of the effects of characterization methods selection on the landslide susceptibility: a comparison between logistic regression (LR), naive bayes (NB) and radial basis function network (RBF Network) is a scholarly article[1].

Key Facts

  • Assessment of the effects of characterization methods selection on the landslide susceptibility: a comparison between logistic regression (LR), naive bayes (NB) and radial basis function network (RBF Network)'s instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Assessment of the effects of characterization methods selection on the landslide susceptibility: a comparison between logistic regression (LR), naive bayes (NB) and radial basis function network (RBF Network). Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/assessment-of-the-effects-of-characterization-methods-selection-on-the-landslide-susceptibility-a-comparison-between-log
MLA “Assessment of the effects of characterization methods selection on the landslide susceptibility: a comparison between logistic regression (LR), naive bayes (NB) and radial basis function network (RBF Network).” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/assessment-of-the-effects-of-characterization-methods-selection-on-the-landslide-susceptibility-a-comparison-between-log.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_assessment-of-the-effects-of-characterization-methods-selection-on-the-landslide-susceptibility-a-comparison-between-log_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Assessment of the effects of characterization methods selection on the landslide susceptibility: a comparison between logistic regression (LR), naive bayes (NB) and radial basis function network (RBF Network)}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/assessment-of-the-effects-of-characterization-methods-selection-on-the-landslide-susceptibility-a-comparison-between-log}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Assessment of the effects of characterization methods selection on the landslide susceptibility: a comparison between logistic regression (LR), naive bayes (NB) and radial basis function network (RBF Network) — https://4ort.xyz/entity/assessment-of-the-effects-of-characterization-methods-selection-on-the-landslide-susceptibility-a-comparison-between-log (retrieved 2026-05-24)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/assessment-of-the-effects-of-characterization-methods-selection-on-the-landslide-susceptibility-a-comparison-between-log · Last refreshed: