Home ›
Entities
› academia
› Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases
Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases
Research article (Frontiers in Education, 2022) · cited 21× · AI/ML
Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases
Summary
Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/assessing-the-quality-of-argumentative-texts-examining-the-general-agreement-between-different-rating-procedures-and-exp
MLA“Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/assessing-the-quality-of-argumentative-texts-examining-the-general-agreement-between-different-rating-procedures-and-exp.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_assessing-the-quality-of-argumentative-texts-examining-the-general-agreement-between-different-rating-procedures-and-exp_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/assessing-the-quality-of-argumentative-texts-examining-the-general-agreement-between-different-rating-procedures-and-exp}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases — https://4ort.xyz/entity/assessing-the-quality-of-argumentative-texts-examining-the-general-agreement-between-different-rating-procedures-and-exp (retrieved 2026-05-24)
