Home › Entities › academia › Answering questions in a co‐created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise

Answering questions in a co‐created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise

Research article (Pharmacology Research & Perspectives, 2021) · cited 24× · AI/ML
academia openalex:W3183541999
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

Answering questions in a co‐created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise

Summary

Answering questions in a co‐created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise is a scholarly article[1].

Key Facts

  • Answering questions in a co‐created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). Answering questions in a co‐created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/answering-questions-in-a-cocreated-formative-exam-question-bank-improves-summative-exam-performance-while-students-perce
MLA “Answering questions in a co‐created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/answering-questions-in-a-cocreated-formative-exam-question-bank-improves-summative-exam-performance-while-students-perce.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_answering-questions-in-a-cocreated-formative-exam-question-bank-improves-summative-exam-performance-while-students-perce_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{Answering questions in a co‐created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/answering-questions-in-a-cocreated-formative-exam-question-bank-improves-summative-exam-performance-while-students-perce}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): Answering questions in a co‐created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise — https://4ort.xyz/entity/answering-questions-in-a-cocreated-formative-exam-question-bank-improves-summative-exam-performance-while-students-perce (retrieved 2026-05-24)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/answering-questions-in-a-cocreated-formative-exam-question-bank-improves-summative-exam-performance-while-students-perce · Last refreshed: