Home › Entities › academia › A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Fiberoptic Selection and Guidance Versus Random Selection, Blind Insertion, and Direct Laryngoscopy, on the Incidence and Severity of Epistaxis After Nasotracheal Intubation

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Fiberoptic Selection and Guidance Versus Random Selection, Blind Insertion, and Direct Laryngoscopy, on the Incidence and Severity of Epistaxis After Nasotracheal Intubation

Research article (Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2018) · cited 22× · AI/ML
academia openalex:W2801451351
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Fiberoptic Selection and Guidance Versus Random Selection, Blind Insertion, and Direct Laryngoscopy, on the Incidence and Severity of Epistaxis After Nasotracheal Intubation

Summary

A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Fiberoptic Selection and Guidance Versus Random Selection, Blind Insertion, and Direct Laryngoscopy, on the Incidence and Severity of Epistaxis After Nasotracheal Intubation is a scholarly article[1].

Key Facts

  • A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Fiberoptic Selection and Guidance Versus Random Selection, Blind Insertion, and Direct Laryngoscopy, on the Incidence and Severity of Epistaxis After Nasotracheal Intubation's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].

References

Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.

Direct Wikidata claims

  1. [2] ↑ . wikidata.org.

Class ancestry

  1. [1] ↑ . Wikidata. wikidata.org.

📑 Cite this page

Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.

APA 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Fiberoptic Selection and Guidance Versus Random Selection, Blind Insertion, and Direct Laryngoscopy, on the Incidence and Severity of Epistaxis After Nasotracheal Intubation. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-randomized-trial-comparing-the-effect-of-fiberoptic-selection-and-guidance-versus-random-selection-blind-insertion-and
MLA “A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Fiberoptic Selection and Guidance Versus Random Selection, Blind Insertion, and Direct Laryngoscopy, on the Incidence and Severity of Epistaxis After Nasotracheal Intubation.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-randomized-trial-comparing-the-effect-of-fiberoptic-selection-and-guidance-versus-random-selection-blind-insertion-and.
BibTeX @misc{4ortxyz_a-randomized-trial-comparing-the-effect-of-fiberoptic-selection-and-guidance-versus-random-selection-blind-insertion-and_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Fiberoptic Selection and Guidance Versus Random Selection, Blind Insertion, and Direct Laryngoscopy, on the Incidence and Severity of Epistaxis After Nasotracheal Intubation}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-randomized-trial-comparing-the-effect-of-fiberoptic-selection-and-guidance-versus-random-selection-blind-insertion-and}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM prompt According to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effect of Fiberoptic Selection and Guidance Versus Random Selection, Blind Insertion, and Direct Laryngoscopy, on the Incidence and Severity of Epistaxis After Nasotracheal Intubation — https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-randomized-trial-comparing-the-effect-of-fiberoptic-selection-and-guidance-versus-random-selection-blind-insertion-and (retrieved 2026-05-24)

Canonical URL: https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-randomized-trial-comparing-the-effect-of-fiberoptic-selection-and-guidance-versus-random-selection-blind-insertion-and · Last refreshed: