Home ›
Entities
› academia
› A comparison of conventional vs automated digital Peer Assessment Rating scoring using the Carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial
A comparison of conventional vs automated digital Peer Assessment Rating scoring using the Carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial
Research article (American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2020) · cited 15× · AI/ML
A comparison of conventional vs automated digital Peer Assessment Rating scoring using the Carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial
Summary
A comparison of conventional vs automated digital Peer Assessment Rating scoring using the Carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
A comparison of conventional vs automated digital Peer Assessment Rating scoring using the Carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). A comparison of conventional vs automated digital Peer Assessment Rating scoring using the Carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-comparison-of-conventional-vs-automated-digital-peer-assessment-rating-scoring-using-the-carestream-3600-scanner-and-c
MLA“A comparison of conventional vs automated digital Peer Assessment Rating scoring using the Carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-comparison-of-conventional-vs-automated-digital-peer-assessment-rating-scoring-using-the-carestream-3600-scanner-and-c.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_a-comparison-of-conventional-vs-automated-digital-peer-assessment-rating-scoring-using-the-carestream-3600-scanner-and-c_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{A comparison of conventional vs automated digital Peer Assessment Rating scoring using the Carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-comparison-of-conventional-vs-automated-digital-peer-assessment-rating-scoring-using-the-carestream-3600-scanner-and-c}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): A comparison of conventional vs automated digital Peer Assessment Rating scoring using the Carestream 3600 scanner and CS Model+ software system: A randomized controlled trial — https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-comparison-of-conventional-vs-automated-digital-peer-assessment-rating-scoring-using-the-carestream-3600-scanner-and-c (retrieved 2026-05-24)
