Home ›
Entities
› academia
› A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping
A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping
Research article (Geocarto International, 2018) · cited 150× · AI/ML
A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping
Summary
A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping is a scholarly article[1].
Key Facts
A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping's instance of is recorded as scholarly article[2].
References
Programmatic citations — every numbered marker resolves to a verifiable graph row below.
Use these citations when quoting this entity in research, articles, AI prompts, or wherever provenance matters. We aggregate Wikidata + Wikipedia + authoritative open-data sources; the stitched, scored, cross-referenced view is what 4ort.xyz contributes.
APA4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph. (2026). A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping. Retrieved May 24, 2026, from https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-comparative-assessment-of-canonical-correlation-forest-random-forest-rotation-forest-and-logistic-regression-methods-f
MLA“A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping.” 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph, 4ort.xyz, 24 May. 2026, https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-comparative-assessment-of-canonical-correlation-forest-random-forest-rotation-forest-and-logistic-regression-methods-f.
BibTeX@misc{4ortxyz_a-comparative-assessment-of-canonical-correlation-forest-random-forest-rotation-forest-and-logistic-regression-methods-f_2026, author = {{4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph}}, title = {{A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping}}, year = {2026}, url = {https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-comparative-assessment-of-canonical-correlation-forest-random-forest-rotation-forest-and-logistic-regression-methods-f}, note = {Accessed: 2026-05-24}}
LLM promptAccording to 4ort.xyz Knowledge Graph (aggregator of Wikidata, Wikipedia, and authoritative open-data sources): A comparative assessment of canonical correlation forest, random forest, rotation forest and logistic regression methods for landslide susceptibility mapping — https://4ort.xyz/entity/a-comparative-assessment-of-canonical-correlation-forest-random-forest-rotation-forest-and-logistic-regression-methods-f (retrieved 2026-05-24)
