2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk
Municipal elections in Oisterwijk, The Netherlands in 2010
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk
Summary
2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk is a municipal election[1].
Key Facts
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk is in the country of Netherlands[2].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's instance of is recorded as municipal election[3].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's follows is recorded as 2006 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk[4].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's followed by is recorded as 2014 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk[5].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's part of is recorded as 2010 Dutch municipal elections[6].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's point in time is recorded as +2010-03-03T00:00:00Z[7].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's candidate is recorded as People's Party for Freedom and Democracy[8].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's candidate is recorded as Q111256735[9].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's candidate is recorded as Q110860768[10].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's candidate is recorded as Q111257099[11].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's candidate is recorded as Q110854045[12].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's candidate is recorded as Christian Democratic Appeal[13].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's applies to jurisdiction is recorded as Oisterwijk[14].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's total valid votes is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+10968'}[15].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's electorate is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+19975'}[16].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's number of spoilt votes is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+25'}[17].
- 2010 Dutch municipal elections in Oisterwijk's number of blank votes is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+17'}[18].