1896 Waverley colonial by-election
Election result for Waverley, New South Wales, Australia
Press Enter · cited answer in seconds
0 sources
1896 Waverley colonial by-election
Summary
1896 Waverley colonial by-election is a by-election[1]. It draws 1 Wikipedia views per month (by_election category, ranking #43 of 384).[2]
Key Facts
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election is in the country of Australia[3].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's instance of is recorded as by-election[4].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's part of is recorded as Electoral results for the district of Waverley[5].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's part of is recorded as list of New South Wales state by-elections[6].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's office contested is recorded as Member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly[7].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's point in time is recorded as +1896-02-20T00:00:00Z[8].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's candidate is recorded as Henry Parkes[9].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's successful candidate is recorded as Thomas Jessep[10].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's total valid votes is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+1386'}[11].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's total valid votes is recorded as {'unit': 'http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q11229', 'amount': '+99.4'}[12].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's eligible voters is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+2242'}[13].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's ballots cast is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+1395'}[14].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's ballots cast is recorded as {'unit': 'http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q11229', 'amount': '+62.2'}[15].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's number of spoilt votes is recorded as {'unit': '1', 'amount': '+9'}[16].
- 1896 Waverley colonial by-election's number of spoilt votes is recorded as {'unit': 'http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q11229', 'amount': '+0.7'}[17].
Why It Matters
1896 Waverley colonial by-election draws 1 Wikipedia views per month (by_election category, ranking #43 of 384).[2]